DevilsFan wrote: ↑Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:41 am
BOMBSHELL REPORT: Testimony at Arizona Senate Elections Committee Reveals Evidence that THREE OF THE FIVE Maricopa County Supervisors have recorded documents EVIDENCING the acceptance of bribes..
MEDIA SILENT..
As time does,...the FACTS come out that support this presentation.
The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023
On February 23rd, of this year, Jaqueline Breger, the principal investigator for Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, at the invitation of State Representative Liz Harris (R), made a presentation to a joint committee for the state of Arizona on Municipal Oversight and Elections, which was shocking in scope and magnitude of both the various levels of statewide corruption and election fraud.
The report presented was assembled under the direction of John Harris Thaler, Senior Attorney in charge of investigations, who has specialized in racketeering and corruption for over 30 years. His five-man team, which has participated in some of the largest investigations of racketeering and public corruption both in the U.S. and Mexico, also draws in various experts, or advisors in multiple disciplines, as may be required, for specific aspects of investigations.
In the presentation and supporting documentation, Breger named names of those who benefited from the corruption, which was laid out in some considerable detail. More specifically, forty people are listed on page 85 of the 96-page document, as being the beneficiary of fraudulent second trust deeds. Such deeds are issued by shell companies with no expectations of the deeds being paid back. Many of those names are those of people holding elected office, on the committee or well known to those on that committee. If the information contained was false, then the presenter and Thaler have opened themselves up to litigation. Yet no such litigation has been filed or threatened.
The natural tendency of the guilty is to vociferously proclaim their innocence, while simultaneously circling the wagons to protect themselves and their grubstakes.
In reviewing some of the hit pieces written regarding the presentation, there was at least one common thread:
“no evidence” was presented was often repeated. This was clearly not true to anyone who reviewed the 96 pages of the report that was given to the committee.
One example of the evidence contained was the deposition on page 28 of one Richard Salazar, who under penalty of perjury stated that he saw multiple boxes of ballots and cash delivered from a private residence in Tempe, to Runbeck Election Services, the company hired by Maricopa County to assist in the counting of absentee ballots.