Designer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:55 amSooo....timmy's back at.. "barking up the wrong tree"...again. ... stooping to his usual wiggling.
Get ready, timmy,...this is going to sting.
The ONLY reason this didn't go to a full blow trial...AS IT WAS GOING TO BE... was NOT because the perp was a "special needs" sicko..... As you claim here:Tbeck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 1:10 pmAll anyone with knowledge of educational laws needs to see is the "SPECIAL NEEDS" description to understand that this is not going to trial.....and he's not getting convicted.
You appear to want to argue about the points that I presented, but you're barking up the WRONG tree.
So we end up with a 6'6" 270lb anger issue that has no business being mainstreamed, who is protected from any liability due to the law's. Those are the fact's and the issue.
It didn't GO TO TRIAL solely because he plead ..."no contest". Had he not done that,... IT WOULD have gone to trial.
Well, well!....seems ole timmy is WRONG AGAIN.
So in finality,...to use your own words...." Those are the fact's and the issue".
Took you 11 days for that tripe.