The Greatest Story Never Told

[sgtcall]

For anyone interested in history, mainly WWII, this is the story of what happened yet, what never made it to our history books. Worth the watch but it is long so you may need to watch it a few parts at a time. The movie is broken down into parts but it all runs continuously. Of course you will never find this on YouTube.

Adolf Hitler : The Greatest Story Never Told

https://odysee.com/@Inconvenient-Truths ... set=lbrytv

PART 1 - Adolf Hitler's childhood, from his birth and early life, throughout his WW1 exploits and into his early political career.

PART 2 - Hitler goes to prison whilst Germany descends into poverty. The NSDAP rise to power, the Nuremberg Rallies and Germany prospers again.

PART 3 - History of the swastika including the Anschluss, more on Hitler’s relationship with Eva Braun, and the Sudeten conflict.

PART 4 - Germany and the Jews, Crystal Night and the Transfer Agreement between Palestine & Germany, and Benjamin Freedman speech.

PART 5 - The truth behind WW1 and the Treaty of Versailles which was a great injustice ultimately leading to the Allies declaring WW2.

PART 6 - England and France declare war because of the German-Polish conflict, meanwhile in Berlin, everyone celebrates a great victory.

PART 7 - The American Racism that has carried on way into the 60’s and Roosevelt’s Fake Neutrality and deception.

PART 8 - War in Europe and the daring Operation Barbarossa, the push into Russia to cripple Zionist Communism forever.

PART 9 - After the bloodiest part of WW2 and most likely the darkest hour the Allies would like us to forget. The dishonour and lies that we have been told, and the blood that has been drawn to cover it up.

PART 10 -Stalingrad and the onslaught of German Forces East with Japan in the South-East fighting Communism against China and France.

PART 11 - The Red Terror and the Partisans as the Wermacht retreat westward at the Battle of Kursk, then the Bloodiest Massacre at Katyn and the cover-ups.

PART 12 - Breaking Mussolini out the daring prison break by the most dangerous man in Europe, Otto Skorzeny, called Operation Oak. Hitler chooses three men to free Mussolini.

PART 13 - This episode shows the hidden web of money and lies and the billions of dollars the Americans invested into the rise of Communism.

PART 14 - General Leon DeGrelle, the most famous of the Waffen SS. "My Honour is My Loyalty", he earned all stripes from Corporal to General, and died at the age of 87.

PART 15 - Battle of the Bulge, which nearly turned the War on it's head; the march through Moscow to the Gulag; and one man's heroic escape home to his family.

PART 16 - The Treachery and the bombing of civilians by the Americans and British; Stalin slaughtering millions upon millions of Russians and Germans.

PART 17 - Battle of Berlin and the death of Adolf Hitler; the Russians are bombarding Berlin from the east; in the west the Allies pushing hard; Berlin falls.

PART 18 - The horrific deaths of Joseph & Magda Goebbels, Operation Slaughterhouse, and the Allied mistreatment of German prisoners.

PART 19 - The de-Nazification and ethnic cleansing of the Germans, whilst in Asia, the war continues with Japan.

PART 20 - The London Cage, a series of nine cages in Britain where the torture of Germans took place.

PART 21 - David Cole, the history of the six million.

PART 22 - Plunder of German technology, defeat brings retribution.

PART 23 - Return of the German POW’s, the rise and fall of the Berlin Wall, the great Allied "East German" deception.

PART 24 - Hitler’s economic miracle - The Media Revenge - And what if? What if Germany had actually won and Utopia had lost?

PART 25 - Operation Thunder, fighting to save Europe, the Charlemagne Waffen SS and Hitler’s Lament.

PART 26 - Credits & Thanks, Video list of all sources and links that contributed to this epic documentary.

PART 27 - Babylon Before Hitler - Bonus, Adolf Hitler was a man of high morals and proved it by cleaning up the depraved streets of the Marxist cesspit otherwise known as Berlin.

[sgtcall]

Updated link. The old one is having issues.
https://archive.org/details/adolf-hitle ... (Full).mp4

[Tbeck]

Actually all that stuff is in the history books and is taught in most schools.

[sgtcall]

Actually all that stuff is in the history books and is taught in most schools.

I only remember being tought that everything Hitler ever did was evil and the Ukarianian genocide was never mentioned. Stalin and his atrocities were never talked about and the fact that Hitler invaded Poland to save ethinic Germans was something I only knew from talkig to Germans. I found the movie intrensting and there were several good points that most of us have frogotten or never knew.

[Tbeck]

Sgt, there's a LOT of things people have been led to believe that simply aren't supported by facts OR provide a flimsy argument for bad actions. So you really need to weigh the facts.
For example you mentioned the invasion of Poland being humanitarian. The same argument was given for the invasion of Austria and Hungary. Wasn't true but it's a great excuse. If it was humanitarian there wouldn't have been a need for Hitler and Stalin to sign a non-aggression pact and draw up territorial boundaries.
The Japanese are taught that the US attacked them first, not that they attacked Pearl starting the Pacific conflict. Pearl according to them was retaliation for our attacks. What were our attacks? Embargos because of their aggression in China.
So as you see an argument for bad actions can always be made.
You probably weren't taught about the racism and genocides other than the European Jews in school. It is taught today in most schools. The Russians, Germans, and a lot of other nations committed terrible genocides, and they never got taught because our government covered them up instead of intervention. Jews, Ukrainian, Arab, Bask, and the list goes on.

This is getting long so I will leave you with this; why do you suppose the USA failed to intervene in the early year's of WWII if the Germans were committing genocide against the European Jews? And why didn't we provide asylum before, during or after for the same group?

[HARRIS]

BECAUSE ROOSEVELT DID'T WANT OR CARE, HE EVEN TURNED AWAY A BOATLOAD AND THEY ALL WERE KILLED WHEN IT LANDED ...

[sgtcall]

When I was in US Army Europe HQ I worked with a German major who was an Exercise planner, we had a few Germans as part of an exchange program. We had to go to a week long meeting on a Polish base about 100 miles from the German boarder. While there he wanted to to go the town his mother and grandparents were from, I don't remember the name of the town. We drove to the town one afternoon and I said something about not knowing his family was Polish and he said they aren't they were German but the area had been given to Poland after WWI. His mother and her mother escaped Poland with the German army during WWII but her father was killed before the escape. Just like the current Ukriane war this was not a war of boarders it was a war of the ethnic 'tribes' that live in Europe. The boarders are just put there but don't really mean much to the people. Just like Putin is saving Russians that live in the Ukarine Hitler went in to protect Germans living in Poland.

We didn't get involved in WWII until the banks needed us to. I don't think the US cared at all about the genocide going on and was more than happy to just let it happen. If the alies would not have destroyed the German econmy and changed the boarders after WWI there would have been no reason for WWII to ever start. It even shows in the movie that before the genocide started Hitler was moving the German Jews to Plastine. It is true he din't want them in Germany mainly because they controled the banking and he wanted control over the money.

[Tbeck]

There's a number of problems with the humanitarian invasion of Poland. I previously mentioned the deal between Hitler and Stalin. In addition to that you wouldn't use the blitzkrieg strategy if you wanted people alive. The Third big problem was the forced conscription of Polish national by the German army. My father in-law was one of the forced conscripts.
There's no doubt that a good number of Germans lived in Poland just as they lived in Austria and Hungary. However the German official policy documents clearly stated Hitler's intentions of lebensraum. As for Poland? It has existed off and on throughout the centuries. It was simply reestablished during the treaty of Versailles as were many other territories that had been dissolved in years before.
The problem with history and documentaries is that you have to make documentaries interesting at the expense of accuracy. The history channel puts out just as much false history as it does good history.
The second problem with history is that people only learn a fraction of the history. It takes year's or even decades just to learn one small bit. For example you mentioned banks. You'd be hard pressed to learn about the financial happening in the year 1941 in a single decade, it's quite an extensive study.
People spend a lifetime learning one very small piece of the larger historical picture. However most average people believe that they learned and know history, they don't. What they know is but a brief overview of a period in history.

[hillsy v2]

There's an old saying "the past is told by those who win" which can also put an inaccurate spin on historical events. Especially in warfare.

[Tbeck]

hiilsy, I am a strong believer that history reflects not what the winners say happened, but rather a brief overview of what a layman can agree with. Wars in the 20th century were world events unlike wars in previous centuries. Because of this there were no unbiased observer's to record accurate events.
Additionally because the losses were experienced so broadly, a strong desire to record an account that would prevent future generations from being willing to do it again was present.
Historians have picked apart, researched the fine details, and written many very accurate histories supported by the sources and hard evidence. Unfortunately it's extremely difficult to get "history" published. Sure anyone can publish what we like to refer to as a book on history, but you'll find that those so called "histories" are not written by historians and have not been through peer review. Because of the aforementioned we aren't getting history, but rather someone's version that isn't corroborated. This leads to bias and different versions for different people.
It's sad, but at the same time interesting. What will generations in year's to come, think about our record keeping?