Intruders-Alert

First words that pop in my head when I keep seeing these news/entertainment personalities being character assassinated and dropping left and right. [emoji2]

I don't know why. I'm not a history buff.

Bull shit purge more like it. Draining the sewer to expose the rats.
Amazing thing is the news/entertainment elite are devouring their own.

Probably only a matter of time at this rate before someone comes forward and claims she was "grabbed by the pussy".

Then things will REALLY get interesting....

Soon, we will be hearing about powerful women being taken down by men complaining…

hillsy wrote:Probably only a matter of time at this rate before someone comes forward and claims she was "grabbed by the pussy".

Then things will REALLY get interesting....

I don't think anyone listens to Obama any more. If they do they don't care if he got grabbed or not. [space]

BlacktopTravelr wrote:

hillsy wrote:Probably only a matter of time at this rate before someone comes forward and claims she was "grabbed by the pussy".

Then things will REALLY get interesting....

I don't think anyone listens to Obama any more. If they do they don't care if he got grabbed or not. [space]

hillsy wrote:Probably only a matter of time at this rate before someone comes forward and claims she was "grabbed by the pussy".

Then things will REALLY get interesting....

More of your BS.

13 women tried to make those sort of "claims" before The Election,....Where are all of the 13 of them now?

IF they had Anything Of Substance against THE Donald Trump,...you can BET the biased "News Media" would be spewing their
"stories" ALL OVER the place.....Do you see them in the News?


So,.... take your "Trump-hate" and stick it where the Sun doesn't shine.

I think it's probably character assassination ONLY if it's untrue accusations. I believe that most of the recent accusations look pretty solid.

With that said, is it sexual harassment, etc..if both parties were consenting adults?

Then we have all the congressional member accusations that have congressmen dropping like flies.

As for Trump? He's no angel I am sure, and his undercover guy conversations seem to support that. Did he do anything for which he should be criticised? Other than some over the top guy bravado, ain't nothing substantiated.

Designer wrote:

hillsy wrote:Probably only a matter of time at this rate before someone comes forward and claims she was "grabbed by the pussy".

Then things will REALLY get interesting....

More of your BS.

13 women tried to make those sort of "claims" before The Election,....Where are all of the 13 of them now?

IF they had Anything Of Substance against THE Donald Trump,...you can BET the biased "News Media" would be spewing their
"stories" ALL OVER the place.....Do you see them in the News?


So,.... take your "Trump-hate" and stick it where the Sun doesn't shine.

There appears to be 20 of them now....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... -full-list

Who knows?

hillsy wrote:
There appears to be 20 of them now....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... -full-list

Who knows?

“He kissed me on the lips” Really? That all you stupid people got? There’s got to be at least a hundred women who if still alive could say I licked their labia! Big whoop. This world is populated with idiots.

Notice,....NONE of them has proved their case,...AT ALL. [space] These Women can SAY anything,..Without proof, all this is nothing but empty words, lacking substance and verity. Until PROVEN guilty, a Person is INNOCENT.

And Notice the timing? [space] Those 13 suddenly "appeared" at the very last minute, just before the Voting Date of the Election? [space] When there is not enough time to thoroughly investigate such accusations.[space] Where were they back 6/8 months BEFORE during the Presidential Campaign ? .... or even before that?

This is nothing other than a Smear Attack Tactic that The left-wingers tried in their VAIN attempt to keep THE Donald Trump out of the Oval Office. (and FAILED )

The True Americans see Right through such left-wing Under-handed Tactics using Unsubstantiated Allegations (and their timing) as the LIES they are.

Tbeck wrote:I think it's probably character assassination ONLY if it's untrue accusations. I believe that most of the recent accusations look pretty solid.

With that said, is it sexual harassment, etc..if both parties were consenting adults?

Then we have all the congressional member accusations that have congressmen dropping like flies.

It is. Consent given under duress is not consent. In fact technically in Michigan it's a 5 year felony for anyone with authority over someone else to have sex with them. ie. A boss with a direct subordinate, a teacher with a student, an arresting officer with a suspect, a president with an intern, etc...
It dates back to the 1930's and probably had racial implications attached to it. "Violating 'community standards'" ...
Don't ask why I know so much about this......

PS, yep I know several states have some law's like you mentioned. Are they ever enforced? Likely not too often if at all.
My thought is that you're an adult that has the ability to say no any time regarding anything within the workplace. It's getting a little old now when after year's have passed, women are making claims they didn't make at time of said offense. Given they didn't come forward in a timely manner they must have either been a willing participant or they didn't believe that it rose to a level worth reporting.
Some folks will disagree with the aforementioned but I see no other way this can be viewed, BECAUSE any possibility of acquiring legal proof has long since sailed. Our legal system is not supposed to operate on he said, she said to convict. If these gain legal standing, anyone can be convicted.

Tbeck wrote:PS, yep I know several states have some law's like you mentioned. Are they ever enforced? Likely not too often if at all.
My thought is that you're an adult that has the ability to say no any time regarding anything within the workplace. It's getting a little old now when after year's have passed, women are making claims they didn't make at time of said offense. Given they didn't come forward in a timely manner they must have either been a willing participant or they didn't believe that it rose to a level worth reporting.
Some folks will disagree with the aforementioned but I see no other way this can be viewed, BECAUSE any possibility of acquiring legal proof has long since sailed. Our legal system is not supposed to operate on he said, she said to convict. If these gain legal standing, anyone can be convicted.

+1

Tbeck wrote:PS, yep I know several states have some law's like you mentioned. Are they ever enforced? Likely not too often if at all.
My thought is that you're an adult that has the ability to say no any time regarding anything within the workplace. It's getting a little old now when after year's have passed, women are making claims they didn't make at time of said offense. Given they didn't come forward in a timely manner they must have either been a willing participant or they didn't believe that it rose to a level worth reporting.
Some folks will disagree with the aforementioned but I see no other way this can be viewed, BECAUSE any possibility of acquiring legal proof has long since sailed. Our legal system is not supposed to operate on he said, she said to convict. If these gain legal standing, anyone can be convicted.

So far, these "entertainers" are being "convicted" with their careers, which for some of these narcissists I can imagine is worse than being jailed.

But I do find it amazing that, the politicians are NOT being "convicted". Why? Because they are "elected" and appear to be above any laws and/or scrutiny. Sure, they'll take a media exposure hit but they are never FORCED out of office.
Shit, there's been millions of dollars in (taxpayer) payouts for the victims...but never any arrests or removals, unless said accused denounces themselves.
THIS is the real swamp!

Some women should be thankful that anyone gave them a second look. Isn't it in the natural scheme of things that women seek attention from men? Seems that the first time a man does anything aggressive should be taken as natural and normal. After that first time it is up to the woman to let the guy know if further flirtations are welcome. Most guys will get the message. It is not in anyone's best interest to treat a sexual advance as criminal, especially if it's an innocent first time deal. There are quite a few women out there who will lead a man on, officially known as prick teasers. Some of the women making accusations are probably in that category.

IT'S GREAT ! THEY WRITE THE LAWS THAT SOMEHOW LET THEM DO AS THEY WANT, AND THE PUBLIC PAYS THEIR FINES .... SO WHY SHOULD THEY EVER STOP ?

THEIR PUSSY SURE COSTS A LOT, IN THE GOVERNMENT WAY OF ALL COST OVER RUNS !

I GOT A ZIPLESS SCREW ...

It's just funny to me when I start considering motives and reasoning...I mean that was their main push on Trump (still is, apparently), try to make him out to be some frat-boy misogynist scumbag, and when it just didn't seem to work at all, they realized hey...we mighta shot ourselves in the foot here...BUT WAIT! We can still make it work...we shank alla our guys who ever made an inappropriate advance, then we got the appearance of moral high ground here. Yay! Which is, after all what sells to the uninformed...image, not substance...

Way I see it, anyway [emoji2]

Bet Bill Cosby is yelling,"See told you I was normal"! He may even be able to see again? Bill Clinton is sure not talking much?

jeffcoslacker wrote:It's just funny to me when I start considering motives and reasoning...I mean that was their main push on Trump (still is, apparently), try to make him out to be some frat-boy misogynist scumbag, and when it just didn't seem to work at all, they realized hey...we mighta shot ourselves in the foot here...BUT WAIT! We can still make it work...we shank alla our guys who ever made an inappropriate advance, then we got the appearance of moral high ground here. Yay! Which is, after all what sells to the uninformed...image, not substance...

Way I see it, anyway [emoji2]

I think there's something in what DevilsFan said:

DevilsFan wrote:
But I do find it amazing that, the politicians are NOT being "convicted". Why? Because they are "elected" and appear to be above any laws and/or scrutiny. Sure, they'll take a media exposure hit but they are never FORCED out of office.
Shit, there's been millions of dollars in (taxpayer) payouts for the victims...but never any arrests or removals, unless said accused denounces themselves.

There seems to be a "tolerance" to some degree when it comes to the top job.